Skip to content

P1789R3 Library Support for Expansion Statements #8482

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
tkoeppe merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2025
Merged

P1789R3 Library Support for Expansion Statements #8482

tkoeppe merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2025
+57 −4

Conversation

@Tsche
Copy link
Member

@Tsche Tsche commented Nov 9, 2025 •
edited by jensmaurer
Loading

Fixes #8473

Also fixes cplusplus/papers#535
Also fixes cplusplus/nbballot#584
Also fixes cplusplus/nbballot#721
Also fixes cplusplus/nbballot#722
Also fixes cplusplus/nbballot#723

@Tsche
Copy link
Member Author

Tsche commented Nov 9, 2025

While applying the paper I noticed that we use the section title "Tuple interface" in [complex.tuple] and [array.tuple] instead. Shall we do the same here and rename [intseq.binding] to [intseq.tuple] along with "Tuple interface" as title?

@frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

frederick-vs-ja commented Nov 9, 2025

While applying the paper I noticed that we use the section title "Tuple interface" in [complex.tuple] and [array.tuple] instead. Shall we do the same here and rename [intseq.binding] to [intseq.tuple] along with "Tuple interface" as title?

I'm personally fine with such inconsistency because integer_sequence is not made tuple-like.

@eisenwave

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@eisenwave eisenwave added this to the post-2025-11 milestone Nov 9, 2025
eisenwave
eisenwave suggested changes Nov 9, 2025
View reviewed changes
@eisenwave
Copy link
Member

eisenwave commented Nov 12, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Hmm, there are multiple NB comments for this actually:

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Nov 12, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Please amend the commit message per https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/wiki/Commit-message-format#nb-comment-resolutions and force-push. Feel free to squash the fix-up commit at that time.

(add "Also fixes NB ...")

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. label Nov 12, 2025
@Tsche Tsche changed the title [2025-11 LWG Motion 14] P1789R3 Library Support for Expansion Statements P1789R3 Library Support for Expansion Statements Dec 7, 2025
@Tsche @tkoeppe
P1789R3 Library Support for Expansion Statements
3d71a83 
Fixes NB IT 002, FR 007-011, CZ 2-143, US 78-144 (C++26 CD).

Editorial note:
* The declarations of tuple_size and tuple_element are moved to after
  the "synopsis heading" under which their specializations are
  declared, similar to how this is presented elsewhere.
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 05d7344 into cplusplus:main Dec 14, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tkoeppe tkoeppe tkoeppe left review comments

@jensmaurer jensmaurer jensmaurer left review comments

@jwakely jwakely jwakely approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@eisenwave eisenwave eisenwave requested changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

post-2025-11

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[2025-11 LWG Motion 14] P1789R3 Library Support for Expansion Statements P1789 R3 Library Support for Expansion Statements

6 participants

@Tsche @frederick-vs-ja @eisenwave @jensmaurer @jwakely @tkoeppe